COMPARISONS

Standard RO4350B versus LoPro construction

The standard and LoPro options differ in conductor-related construction details. LoPro can be useful when copper-related loss matters, but it also brings thickness and qualification considerations that need explicit review.

ENGINEERING ANSWER

The standard and LoPro options differ in conductor-related construction details. LoPro can be useful when copper-related loss matters, but it also brings thickness and qualification considerations that need explicit review.

What to decide before release

Compare equal circuit requirements with the actual supported foil systems. Revisit the stackup model and any relevant UL requirements. Ask the supplier to quote the exact material rather than a generic low-profile alternative.

Checks to put in your design brief

  • Specify exact material and foil
  • Review effective construction thickness
  • Measure relevant line loss

Important distinction

Do not assume LoPro inherits every qualification of the standard laminate.

Turn this into a design decision

Record your selected construction, the assumptions that affect this topic, and the evidence needed before release. Use the engineering workbench to prepare a preliminary calculation, then discuss the exact stackup and acceptance requirements with the fabricator.

Prepare a fabrication RFQ →

Sources & basis

Material facts follow the cited source. Design checks are preliminary guidance, not supplier process instructions.

Continue your research